. 2020 Jan;34(1):54-64.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003035.
Unilateral and Bilateral Lower-Body Resistance Training Does not Transfer Equally to Sprint and Change of Direction Performance
- PMID: 30844983
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003035
Abstract
Appleby, BB, Cormack, SJ, and Newton, RU. Unilateral and bilateral lower-body resistance training does not transfer equally to sprint and change of direction performance. J Strength Cond Res 34(1): 54-64, 2020-Given maximal strength can be developed using bilateral or unilateral resistance training, the purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of transfer of unilateral or bilateral resistance training to sprint and change of direction (COD) performance. Thirty-three trained participants (average training age = 5.4 ± 2.9 years and 1 repetition maximum [1RM] 90° squat = 177.6 ± 26.7 kg) completed either a bilateral group (BIL, n = 13), unilateral (UNI, n = 10), or comparison (COM, n = 10) 18-week randomized controlled training design. Training involved 2 lower-body, volume-load-matched resistance sessions per week (6-8 sets × 4-8 reps at 45-88% 1RM), differing only in the prescription of a bilateral (squat) or unilateral (step-up) resistance exercise. Strength was assessed through 1RM squat and step-up, in addition to 20-m sprint and a customized 50° COD test. The effect size statistic ± 90% confidence limit (ES ± CL) was calculated to examine the magnitude of difference within and between groups at each time point. BIL and UNI groups improved their trained and nontrained strength exercise with an unclear difference in adaptation of squat strength (ES = -0.34 + 0.55). Both groups improved 20-m sprint (ES: BIL = -0.38 ± 0.49 and UNI = -0.31 ± 0.31); however, the difference between the groups was unclear (ES = 0.07 ± 0.58). Although both groups had meaningful improvements in COD performance, bilateral resistance training had a greater transfer to COD performance than unilateral resistance training (between-groups ES = 0.59 ± 0.64). Both bilateral and unilateral training improved maximal lower-body strength and sprint acceleration. However, the BIL group demonstrated superior improvements in COD performance. This finding potentially highlights the importance of targeting the underlying physiological stimulus that drives adaptation and not exercise selection based on movement specificity of the target performance.
What does this all Mean?
CORE Omaha Explains….
by
Dr. Mark Rathjen PT DPT CSCS.
The Above study is very interesting and may conflict some older ideas that single leg exercises trump Two legged exercises. Overall, we see Change of direction increase greater with two legged exercises, even though cutting and changes of direction occurs normal with just one leg at a time? Likely, the load increases with 2 legged exercises leads to greater overall strength and power production, and allows for more aggressive force production. Both exercises groups also performance very similar in sprint performance, which is considerably less aggressive with change of directional forces.
Great one legged exercises include, lunges, bulgarian splits squats, single leg jumps, romanian deadlifts, single leg resisted step ups, Cross over cuts, side jumps resisted. Two legged exercise examples include; back squats, Zercher squats, front squats, cleans, oly lifting, jumping, depth jumping, deadlifting, jump deadlifting, jump squats, etc.
It its imperative to add one and two leg exercise in programming and rehab protocols, as they each have their respective benefits. How we program for a specific sports relies heavily on research and ability to recover. It also reflects what as aspects and sports metrics apply to the position/sport.
In Omaha, CORE Physical Therapy always keeps up on our research. We implement it in to our protocols. We implement it into our programming. We use it as a tool to shape and reshape what decision making matrix we use in the clinical prediction models we develop.
This is who we are, This is what we do.
C.O.R.E. Physical Therapy and Sports Performance PC,
is
owned and Operated
by
Dr. Mark
Rathjen and Dr. Claire Rathjen. CORE is a family owned business that has been established in
2015 and is proud to serve the greater Omaha metro area.
We specialize in the treatment of athletes.
For More information, Please feel free to contact us https://coreomaha.com/contact/
Please feel free to follow us at https://www.facebook.com/COREomaha/
To get started https://coreomaha.com/getting-started/
For more Blog information https://coreomaha.com/blog/
CORE Physical Therapy and Sports Performance PC.
17660 Wright St, suites 9/10
Omaha, NE 68130
402-933-4027
Similar articles
-
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Feb;33(2):318-326. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002923.PMID: 30688873 Clinical Trial.
-
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):921-929. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002463.PMID: 29420390 Clinical Trial.
-
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jan;12(1):106-114. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0743. Epub 2016 Aug 24.PMID: 27140680 Clinical Trial.
-
Sports Med. 2014 Dec;44(12):1693-702. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0227-1.PMID: 25059334 Review.
-
Resisted Sled Sprint Training to Improve Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review.
Sports Med. 2016 Mar;46(3):381-400. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0422-8.PMID: 26553497 Review.