Joint Manipulation in the Management of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Clinical Commentary
Bill Vicenzino, PT, PhD,
Joshua A. Cleland, PT, PhD, OCS, FAAOMPT, and
Leanne Bisset, PT, MPhty (Sports)
This article has been
cited by other articles in PMC.
Lateral epicondylalgia (LE), epicondylitis, or tennis elbow is a musculoskeletal disorder often encountered by healthcare practitioners, such as physical therapists, and is characterized by pain over the lateral elbow that is typically aggravated by gripping activities1. The syndrome is most prevalent (35–64% of all cases) in jobs requiring repetitive manual tasks, it results in restricted function, and it is one of the more costly of all work-related illnesses2–4. The peak incidence of this condition occurs between the ages of 35 and 50 and usually affects the dominant arm5.
Formerly called lateral epicondylitis, lateral epicondylalgia or epicondylar tendinopathy are more appropriate terms considering that numerous studies6–9 have shown the absence of inflammatory cells in this disorder. It has, therefore, been suggested that the term epicondylitis be abandoned in favor of ‘epicondylalgia1,10,11. Recent evidence suggests that the symptoms associated with LE might be related to a constellation of changes in the extensor carpi radialis brevis and common extensor tendon mechanism. These have been reported to include signs of neurogenic involvement12 as a result of chemical mediators of pain located in myelinated sensory fibers (e.g., substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide)12,13 and increased levels of glutamate (an excitatory amino acid)14, neovascularisation15, and changes in muscle fiber morphology (e.g., fiber necrosis, higher percentage of fast twitch oxidative fibers, and moth eaten fibers)16. Impairments in the sympathetic nervous system (e.g., absent vasomotor response)17 and the presence of mechanical but not thermal hyperalgesia further point to the involvement of the pain and/or sensory systems in this condition18,19.
Currently, no general consensus exists as to the most appropriate management strategy for LE, even though several systematic reviews have been published. A review conducted by Bisset et al20 identified evidence for the use of elbow manipulation21–22 and therapeutic exercise23 in the short term and recommended that the long-term effects of joint manipulation be studied. Other limitations with the current literature include poor methodological quality (i.e., lack of experimental rigor), a finding that has changed little since an earlier systematic review by Labelle24.
Interestingly, in a recent commentary on management of LE, Ashe et al25 listed a number of treatment approaches that included patient education, splinting, modalities (e.g., ice, LASER, and high-voltage galvanic stimulation), strengthening, and stretching. Noteworthy was the omission of joint manipulation from their list. Perhaps this may be related to the fact that LE has long been conceptualized as a musculotendinous disorder and the traditional focus of joint manipulation has been the direct influence upon joint structures rather than musculotendinous tissues26.
Since the last clinical commentary on a manual therapist’s perspective on LE27, a significant number of studies21,22,28–44 have investigated the effects of joint manipulation of the elbow and wrist as well as of the cervical and thoracic spines. The purpose of this paper is to comment on current research investigating the effects of joint manipulation, to elaborate on the hypothesized physiological mechanisms contributing to these clinical effects, and to present a clinical reasoning process to the technique selection that is based on the patient’s clinical presentation. The commentary will provide clinicians with a rationale to refine decision-making regarding the incorporation of joint manipulation for the management of LE.
Conclusion
The literature, and in particular that reporting research of joint manipulation techniques in LE, has greatly increased over the 20 years. This growth in the literature provides an opportunity for practitioners to base clinical decisions on data that is more advanced in its inferential capabilities. For example, practitioners may approach the application of joint manipulations to the spine and peripheral joints with greater confidence of at least deriving short-term effects in pain-free grip force and pressure pain thresholds. The physiological rationale for these effects has also progressed and can now be more plausibly used in explaining clinically observable effects. Despite these advances, there remains much to be studied before there is solid evidence to support the use of joint manipulations in the treatment of LE. Until such data becomes available, we propose that practitioners base clinical decisions on a sound clinical examination and evidence from the literature as presented herein.
What does this Mean?
CORE Physical Therapy in Omaha Explains…
By Dr. Mark Rathjen PT DPT CSCS
The above article overall is very interesting and well developing into the examination of manual therapy and tennis elbow pain/condition management. Other article have studied various strengthening aspects and range deficits, other on manual interventions and post radial head mobilizations. The emerging research early on is very positive though harder to test. Testing becomes hard with manual techniques as provides vary in technique use and implementation. Used with appropriate clinical reasoning, it can decrease the patient visit per episode and visits per diagnosis.
At CORE Physical Therapy in Omaha, we utilize various manual expertise. We also use trigger point dry needling to restore motion and normal tissue kinematics. At that time, overall then the athletes is ready for strengthening and return to sports protocol. Research is paramount in training and retaining our athletes to get the fullest performance in Omaha, and the best results for injury prevention.
C.O.R.E. Physical Therapy and Sports Performance PC,
is
owned and Operated
by
Dr. Mark Rathjen and Dr. Claire Rathjen. CORE is a family owned business that has been
established in
2015 and is proud to serve the greater Omaha metro area.
We specialize in the treatment of athletes.
For More information, Please feel free to contact us https://coreomaha.com/contact/
Please feel free to follow us at https://www.facebook.com/COREomaha/
To get started https://coreomaha.com/getting-started/
For more Blog information https://coreomaha.com/blog/
CORE Physical Therapy and Sports Performance PC.
17660 Wright St, suites 9/10
Omaha, NE 68130
402-933-4027
Google page
REFERENCES
1.
Waugh EJ. Lateral epicondylalgia or epicondylitis: What’s in a name? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:200–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.
Dimberg L. The prevalence and causation of tennis elbow (lateral humeral epicondylitis) in a population of workers in an engineering industry. Ergonomics. 1987;30:573–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.
Feuerstein M, Miller VL, Burrell LM, Berger R. Occupational upper extremity disorders in the federal workforce: Prevalence, health care expenditures, and patterns of work disability. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:546–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.
Kivi P. The etiology and conservative treatment of humeral epicondylitis. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1982;15:37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.
Haker E. Lateral epicondylalgia: Diagnosis, treatment and evaluation. Critical Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 1993;5(2):129–154. [Google Scholar]
6.
Kraushaar BS, Nirschl RP. Tendinosis of the elbow (tennis elbow): Clinical features and findings of histological, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopy studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:259–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.
Nirschl R, Pettrone F. Tennis elbow: The surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979;61A:832–839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.
Potter HG, Hannafin JA, Morwessel RM, DiCarlo EF, O’Brien SJ, Altchek DW. Lateral epicondylitis: Correlation of MR imaging, surgical, and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 1995;196:43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.
Regan W, Wold LE, Coonrad R, Morrey BF. Microscopic histopathology of chronic refractory lateral epicondylitis. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:746–749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.
Khan KM, Cook JL, Kannus P, Maffulli N, Bonar SF. Time to abandon the “tendinitis” myth: Painful, overuse tendon conditions have a noninflammatory pathology. BMJ. 2002;324(7338):626–627.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.
Vicenzino B, Wright A. Lateral epicondylalgia I: A review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, aetiology and natural history. Phys Ther Rev. 1996;1:23–34. [Google Scholar]
12.
Ljung BO, Alfredson H, Forsgren S. Neurokinin 1-receptors and sensory neuropeptides in tendon insertions at the medial and lateral epicondyles of the humerus: Studies on tennis elbow and medial epicondylalgia. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:321–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.
Ljung BO, Forsgren S, Friden J. Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide expression at the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle origin: Implications for the etiology of tennis elbow. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:554–559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.
Alfredson H, Ljung BO, Thorsen K, Lorentzon R. In vivo investigation of ECRB tendons with microdialysis technique: No signs of inflammation but high amounts of glutamate in tennis elbow. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:475–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.
Zeisig E, Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Extensor origin vascularity related to pain in patients with tennis elbow. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2006;14:659–663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.
Ljung BO, Lieber RL, Friden J. Wrist extensor muscle pathology in lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg. 1999;24B:177–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.
Smith RW, Papadopolous E, Mani R, Cawley MI. Abnormal microvascular responses in a lateral epicondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:1166–1168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.
Sran M, Souvlis T, Vicenzino B, Wright A. Characterisation of chronic lateral epicondylalgia using the McGill pain questionnaire, visual analog scales, and quantitative sensory tests. Pain Clinic. 2002;13:251–259. [Google Scholar]
19.
Wright A, Thurnwald P, Smith J. An evaluation of mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in patients with lateral epicondylalgia. Pain Clinic. 1992;5:221–227. [Google Scholar]
20.
Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:411–422. [PMC free article][PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.
Paungmali A, O’Leary S, Souvlis T, Vicenzino B. Naloxone fails to antagonise initial hypoalgesic effect of a manual therapy treatment for lateral epicondylalgia. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003;27:180–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.
Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Buratowski S, Wright A. Specific manipulative therapy treatment for chronic lateral epicondylalgia produces uniquely characteristic hypoalgesia. Man Ther. 2001;6:205–212.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.
Pienimaki T, Tarvainen T, Siira P, Vanharanta H. Progressive strengthening and stretching exercises and ultrasound for chronic lateral epicondylitis. Physiother. 1996;82:522–530. [Google Scholar]
24.
Labelle H, Guibert R, Joncas J, Newman N, Fallaha M, Rivard C. Lack of scientific evidence for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: An attempted meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74B:646–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.
Ashe M, McCauley T, Khan K. Tendinopathies in the upper extremity: A paradigm shift. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:329–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.
Vicenzino B. Lateral epicondylalgia: A musculoskeletal physiotherapy perspective. Man Ther. 2003;8:66–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.
Lee D. Tennis elbow: A manual therapist’s perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1986;8:134–142.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.
Abbott JH. Mobilization with movement applied to the elbow affects shoulder range of movement in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. Man Ther. 2001;6:170–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.
Abbott JH, Patla CE, Jensen RH. The initial effects of an elbow mobilization with movement technique on grip strength in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. Man Ther. 2001;6:163–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.
Cleland JA, Whitman JA, Fritz JM. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy to the cervical spine in the management of lateral epicondylalgia: A retrospective analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34:713–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.
Kochar M, Dogra A. Effectiveness of a specific physiotherapy regimen on patients with tennis elbow. Physiother. 2002;88:333–341. [Google Scholar]
33.
McLean S, Naish R, Reed L, Urry S, Vicenzino B. A pilot study of the manual force level required to produce manipulation induced hypoalgesia. Clin Biomech. 2002;17:304–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.
Paungmali A, O’Leary S, Souvlis T, Vicenzino B. Hypoalgesia and sympathoexcitatory effects of mobilisation with movement for lateral epicondylalgia. Phys Ther. 2003;83:374–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.
Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Smith M. Hypoalgesia induced by elbow manipulation in chronic lateral epicondylalgia does not exhibit tolerance. J Pain. 2003;4:448–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.
Struijs PAA, Damen PJ, Bakker EWP, Blankevoort L, Assendelft WJJ, Van Dijk CN. Manipulation of the wrist for management of lateral epicondylitis: A randomized pilot study. Phys Ther. 2003;83:608–616.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.
Vicenzino B, Cartwright T, Collins D, Wright A. An investigation of stress and pain during manual therapy in asymptomatic subjects. Eur J Pain. 1999;3:13–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.
Vicenzino B, Collins D, Benson H, Wright A. An investigation of the interrelationship between manipulative therapy induced hypoalgesia and sympathoexcitation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:448–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.
Vicenzino B, Collins D, Cartwright T, Wright A. Cardiovascular and respiratory changes produced by lateral glide mobilisation of the cervical spine. Man Ther. 1998;3:67–71. [Google Scholar]
40.
Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. Sudomotor changes induced by neural mobilisation techniques in asymptomatic subjects. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 1994;2:66–74. [Google Scholar]
41.
Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. The initial effects of a cervical spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia. Pain. 1996;68:69–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.
Vicenzino B, Neal R, Collins D, Wright A. The displacement, velocity and frequency profile of the frontal plane motion produced by the cervical lateral glide treatment technique. Clin Biomech. 1999;14:515–521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.
Vicenzino B, O’Callaghan J, Kermode F, Wright A. The influence of naloxone on the initial hypoalgesic effect of spinal manual therapy. In: Devor M, Rowbotham M, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, editors. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Pain. Vol 16. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 2000. pp. 1039–1044. [Google Scholar]
44.
Vicenzino B, Wright A. Effects of a novel manipulative physiotherapy technique on tennis elbow: A single case study. Man Ther. 1995;1:30–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.
Cyriax J. Cyriax’s Illustrated Manual of Orthopaedic Medicine. 2nd ed. Butterworth Heinemann: Oxford, UK; 1983. [Google Scholar]
47.
Stasinopoulos D, Stasinopoulos I. Comparison of effects of Cyriax physiotherapy, a supervised exercise programme and polarized polychromatic non-coherent light (Bioptron light) for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:12–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.
Verhaar JAN, Walenkamp G, Van Mameren H, Kester ADM, Van der-Linden AJ. Local corticosteroid injection versus Cyriax-type physiotherapy for tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78B:128–132.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.
Mulligan B. Manual Therapy: “NAGS”, “SNAGS”, MWMS” etc. 4th ed. Plane View Services: Wellington, NZ; 1999. [Google Scholar]
50.
Stratford P, Levy D. Assessing valid change over time in patients with lateral epicondylitis at the elbow. Clin J Sport Med. 1994;4:88–91. [Google Scholar]
51.
Bird SB, Dickson EW. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale. Ann Emergency Med. 2001;38:639–643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.
Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emergency Med. 2001;38:633–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.
Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Academic Emerg Med. 1998;5:1086–1090. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.
Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emergency Med J. 2001;18:205–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.
Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G, Brooks P, Darnell R, Vicenzino B. Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ 2006:bmj.38961.584653.AE. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56.
Rompe JD, Riedel C, Betz U, Fink C. Chronic lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: A prospective study of low-energy shockwave therapy and low–energy shockwave therapy plus manual therapy of the cervical spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:578–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.
Waugh EJ, Jaglal SB, Davis AM, Tomlinson G, Verrier MC. Factors associated with prognosis of lateral epicondylitis after 8 weeks of physical therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:308–318.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.
Cleland J, Flynn T, Palmer J. Incorporation of manual therapy directed at the cervicothoracic spine in patients with lateral epicondylalgia: A pilot clinical trial. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2005;13:143–151.[Google Scholar]
59.
Elvey R. Treatment of arm pain associated with abnormal brachial plexus tension. Aust J Physiother. 1986;32:225–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.
Smidt N, Lewis M, Van der Windt D, Hay EM, Bouter LM, Croft P. Lateral epicondylitis in general practice: Course and prognostic indicators of outcome. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.
Hay EM, Paterson SM, Lewis M, Hosie G, Croft P. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injection and naproxen for treatment of lateral epicondylitis of elbow in primary care. BMJ. 1999;319(7215):964–968. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.
Smidt N, Van der Windt D, Assendelft WJJ, Deville W, Korthals-de Bos IBC, Bouter LM. Corticosteroid injections, physiotherapy, or a wait-and-see policy for lateral epicondylitis: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9307):657–662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.
Wright A, Thurnwald P, O’Callaghan J, Smith J, Vicenzino B. Hyperalgesia in tennis elbow patients. J Musculoskeletal Pain. 1994;2(4):83–97. [Google Scholar]
64.
Zusman M. Spinal manipulative therapy: Review of some proposed mechanisms and a new hypothesis. Aust J Physiother. 1986;32:89–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.
Chiu T, Wright A. To compare the effects of different rates of application of a cervical mobilisation technique on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Man Ther. 1996;1:198–203.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.
Cleland J, Durall C, Scott S. Effects of slump long sitting on peripheral sudomotor and vasomotor function: A pilot study. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2002;10:67–75. [Google Scholar]
67.
Simon R, Vicenzino B, Wright A. The influence of an anteroposterior accessory glide of the glenohumeral joint on measures of peripheral sympathetic nervous system function in the upper limb. Man Ther. 1997;2:18–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.
Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: Concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Man Ther. 2001;6:72–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.
Souvlis T, Vicenzino B, Wright A. The neurophysiological mechanisms of spinal manual therapy. In: Boyling G, Jull G, editors. Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy. 3rd ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, UK; 2005. pp. 367–379. [Google Scholar]
70.
Souvlis T, Wright A. The tolerance effect: Its relevance to analgesia produced by physiotherapy interventions. Phys Ther Rev. 1997;2:227–237. [Google Scholar]
71.
Skyba DA, Radhakrishnan R, Rohlwing JJ, Wright A, Sluka KA. Joint manipulation reduces hyperalgesia by activation of monoamine receptors but not opioid or GABA receptors in the spinal cord. Pain. 2003;106(1–2):159–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.
Slater H, Arendt-Nielsen L, Wright A, Graven-Nielsen T. Effects of a manual therapy technique in experimental lateral epicondylalgia. Man Ther. 2006;11:107–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.
Wright A, Vicenzino B. Cervical mobilisation techniques, sympathetic nervous system effects and their relationship to analgesia. In: Shacklock M, editor. Moving in on Pain. Adelaide, Australia: Butterworth-Heinemann Australia; 1995. pp. 164–173. [Google Scholar]
74.
Vicenzino B. Commentary: Cleland J, Whitman JM, Fritz JM. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy to the cervical spine in the management of lateral epicondylalgia: A retrospective analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;34:722–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]